1/8/2023 0 Comments Steampipe reaktor![]() It's not a synth but it's relatively new (2015) and a lot of fun. A better dream might be something like a modeled violin that covered the full frequency range from the string bass up to the violin in a single instrument or pitched drums that could be used for playing melodies. Pick any real instrument, find someone who plays it and then play a sampled instrument for them and see what they say about "realism".Īs for the dream of your crystal violin, that's where defining your goals comes in. are difficult to impossible to do with sampling. While modeling may not seem as realistic as sampling, it can be more expressive because things that affect the sound of real instruments like breath, embochure, bowing speed and techniques, etc. The same can be said about non-emulative uses of sampling. Many people still find FM and additive difficult to wrap their heads around. However, I'll point out that all forms of synthesis are non-intuitive when you start out. Maybe it's the dream that's the problem because realistically, a 20' crystal violin might just sound like a really thin violin with bad sustain.You are correct on all counts. Unpredictable noises and glitches within an otherwise nice sound (may be bugs or may be something inherent to the process)Īnd then when you find a sweet spot you can get some very realistic emulations of an acoustic instrument, but they're still not as realistic as a sample. Small sweet spots of usable sounds that can quickly get out of control with a small adjustment of a parameter. A large number of parameters, many of which aren't always intuitive to use or predictable in their results. ![]() I think there are a number of issues with physical modelling, such as:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |